SYNOPSIS:

Conference: ‘Who Owns Your Body? – Beyond The Physical’ (6-7 November 2018)

Dr Gerard Porter, Lecturer in Medical Law & Ethics, Director of Ethics & Integrity, Edinburgh Law School, the University of Edinburgh, the United Kingdom

Abstract: In 1990, the Supreme Court of California’s landmark decision in Moore v Regents of the University of California established a particular way of conceptualising and resolving disputes over patented material derived from the human body. This entailed prioritising the interests of medical researchers – and in the majority of the justices’ view, the public good of biomedical research itself – over the interests of human sources of biological material. The ‘Moore v Regents’ framework has been widely adopted in other jurisdictions around the world. Yet despite being significantly disempowered by the formal legal regimes, donors of biological material have still tried to use a number of different strategies to 13 exercise control over biomedical research and claim remuneration. This talk presents some of the key trends and offers some suggestions for the future.

FULL DETAILS